For more on the Web/OTT bundling issue, see this earlier post.
Source: Apple Plans Web TV Service in Fall, Wall Street Journal
This blog is affiliated with a course at the School of Journalism & Electronic Media at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. I'll try to use it to share relevant news and information with the class, and anyone else who's interested.
"98 percent of [the mobile market] will be shared by Google Android and Apple iOS. There will not be any third spot left. Nokia, Microsoft and RIM will struggle in the remaining 2 percent of the market."There's numbers backing that conclusion. Apple's sold more than 400 million iOS devices, and the number of people who have set up one-click-billing accounts has doubled in the last year (reaching 435 million accounts - last year there were 180 million). Google's Android is also doing well, with more than 1.2 million device activations a day. And there is cross-over as well - the recent Google YouTube iOS app was downloaded a million times in the first 24 hours.
"The innovation rivalry between Apple and Google will not leave any third slot in the mobile space," concluded report author Trip Chowdhry. He added, "Innovation velocity of both Apple and Google far exceeds that of its peers."The analysts see one potential ray of hope for a challenger OS - the fact that Apple and Android dominance (and their competition) have forced wireless operators to heavily subsidize many of the newest products. Some financial analysts have warned that the iPhone 5 launch would likely result in a significant hit on wireless operator profits. The various wireless operators could help a third OS challenger by pushing a third platform; but this is only likely to help if that third platform could offer highly capable, competitive, smartphones at low price points. Microsoft has the funds to subsidize product lines if it wants to, and has been very innovative in the past. Its had a problem, though, getting many of those innovations adopted by consumers.
"This is a resounding victory, not for only Apple and its intellectual property portfolio, but also designers and design rights in general. This verdict strengthens strengthens Apple's design identity, which has arguably has been watered down as each new Apple-like device hit the market," said attorney Christopher Carani, chairman of the American Bar Association's design rights committee.The case considered a total of 24 smartphone models from Samsung - and only three models escaped some or all of the infringement claims (the Galaxy Ace, the Intercept, and the Replenish). The hot-selling Galaxy S models were found to have infringed the most, and Apple is said to be asking the court for an injunction that would prevent Samsung from selling infringing models in the U.S. With Samsung a leader in the booming Android-OS smartphone marketplace, the case is expected to significantly impact on smartphone markets in the near term.
Rather than face the prospect of another Apple suit, rival phone makers will give the iPhone design a wide berth--yielding more space around its design elements than perhaps necessary, Carani predicted.
Not only does the cable TV market, unlike mobile, feature network distributors that also own content, it does not subsidize end user devices, and it is heavily involved in determining the capabilities of those end user set-top box. That final point, in particular, is something that service providers in the mobile market pretty much ceded to Apple.Bernstein's report suggests that Apple might find the differences difficult to overcome. More critically, the primary focus of multichannel has been to provide the widest range of choices to subscribers, and Apple has been insistent on providing what's called a "walled garden" - a limited set of services that conform to Apple's standards. I think that that's going to stand in the way of their move into TV, if they continue to insist on that approach.
You feel that, Apple? Those are the winds of change. It may be temporarily profitable for you to force your customers into spending on upgrades, but a little thing that we call customer lifetime value means that it's stupid to annoy your customers in an increasingly competitive marketplace.
“2011 marked a sea change in the online movies business that saw the balance of consumer spending shift from a DVD-like transactional model to more TV-like subscription approach,” said Dan Cryan, research director for digital media at IHS. “The online movie business more than doubled in 2011 to reach $992 million and it is expected to double this year as well.”Netflix saw its share of (U.S.) domestic online movie market grow from less than 1% in 2010, to earning more than 44% of the market in 2011, while Apple's share fell from 60.8% to 32.2%. Amazon accounted for most of the rest of market revenues.
Yes, 37 million is a big number. It was a decent quarter... (Still, in terms of the smartphone market) there's three out of four people that bought something else. And it represented less than 9% of the handset market, so 9 out of 10 people are buying something else... up against (that), the numbers don't seem so large anymore.So I guess there's still room for further growth
I believe this ubiquity of Apple products on childrens' wish lists is mainly due to Apple's incredibly effective branding and marketing strategies. People just KNOW what an iPad is, what it does, what to expect from it, whereas consumers have to read and carefully compare between other tablet PCs such as the Blackberry Playbook, the Samsung Galaxy Tab, and the dozens of other Android-powered tablets all competing for a share of the tablet market. Because of the wide variety of models for a similar product, no one tablet has been able to market even half as effectively as the iPad (although it should be noted that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was the only Android-powered tablet I could name, due to its aggressive marketing strategy in recent months).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||